OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA / RankWire.AI / – Over 3,000 federal lawsuits accusing social media giants of creating addictive platforms can proceed after a U.S. appeals court dismissed an early legal challenge. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected appeals from Meta Platforms and TikTok on Aug. 10. This ruling maintains the consolidated case before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland. Plaintiffs argue that the platforms’ features fostered harmful, repeated usage among children and teenagers.
Meta and TikTok’s legal challenge was partly based on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. They claimed that this law protected them from liability related to platform content and warnings. The appeals court clarified that Section 230 offers a defense against liability, not immunity from lawsuits, which prevented the companies from immediately appealing. The judges did not decide whether Section 230 might later eliminate specific claims as the cases advance through federal courts.
The federal case involves claims from families, individuals, school districts, municipalities, and state governments. The broader litigation also includes Google and Snap. The plaintiffs contend that these companies utilized product features that promoted compulsive engagement among young users. They link these alleged practices to issues such as depression, anxiety, body image struggles, and other mental health conditions. The companies deny these accusations. Additionally, California state courts are handling about 3,300 consolidated cases involving similar social media addiction allegations.
States file separate child safety lawsuit against Meta
Meta faces a distinct federal lawsuit initiated by 29 state attorneys general. Jury selection is scheduled to begin on Aug. 12 in Oakland, with the trial set to commence on Aug. 17. The states accuse Meta of unlawfully collecting and utilizing children’s personal data. They also allege that Facebook and Instagram incorporated features that encouraged compulsive usage. The complaint further asserts that Meta misled users regarding the safety protections for youth. Meta denies the allegations and is contesting the case in court.
This multistate case includes claims under the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act along with various state consumer protection laws. California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey have also filed claims under their respective laws. A federal judge previously refused to dismiss the case before trial, citing factual disputes requiring further proceedings. Several states have submitted calculations seeking financial penalties if they succeed. Meta disputes these figures and challenges the legal foundation for the requested penalties.
Recent court rulings highlight significant judgments and verdicts
Recent decisions have intensified the legal debates surrounding social media platform design and youth safety. On Aug. 6, a judge in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay $567 million for a youth mental health fund and associated programs. The ruling also mandates five years of safety measures on Facebook and Instagram. In March, a separate New Mexico jury imposed a $375 million civil penalty. These rulings together amount to a total financial exposure of $942 million for Meta in the New Mexico case.
In another case, a Los Angeles jury in March found Meta and Google negligent in a social media addiction lawsuit. Jurors awarded $6 million to a young woman who claimed that her childhood use of Instagram and YouTube caused addiction and mental health harm. TikTok and Snap settled with the plaintiff before trial under undisclosed terms. Meta and Google announced their intention to appeal the verdict. The ongoing federal and state proceedings now span several courts and encompass thousands of claims related to youth engagement on social media platforms.
}}}}}}}}**EOR**<|end_of_text|>**END**}**.**